Theoretical Question
Ok. My man Derk and I are feuding over what would be a more ridiculous shark attack horror movie ala Megalodon.
Jon's idea is a shark sneaks around and kills people with a chain saw. And his explanation is, it's a regular shark that walks on its fins, and if it can walk on land the shark is bound to get a chainsaw, Would you stop a shark from taking your chainsaw? See the will to survive is strong, but the will to kill is even stronger... so the tagline of the movie is 'the shark can do anything, when death is on the menu'. Jiggs:The Chain Saw Wielding Shark will hit theaters in december for the christmas crowd.
My idea is a shark evolves in the depths of the sea, to breathe blood cause it just kills that much, it's always in blood. So essentially he kills just about everything in the sea, so he needs to feed on a different meal. So with his innate ability to breathe in a pool of blood, he comes onto shore by killing a bunch of spring break coeds (probably the laguna beach cast). So he eats his way through the ppl waiting in traffic all the way to a stadium full of people listening to whatever band i can cast (probably MSG cause they're gonna blow up soon). The tagline for the movie is 'When blood is the air, ladies and gentlemen beware'. Shark Attack X: Eater quad-X the Blood Breather will be released straight to beta and laserdisk, in two weeks.
Well anyways which one is more ridiculous? comment now or ask questions...
-the matt
Jon's idea is a shark sneaks around and kills people with a chain saw. And his explanation is, it's a regular shark that walks on its fins, and if it can walk on land the shark is bound to get a chainsaw, Would you stop a shark from taking your chainsaw? See the will to survive is strong, but the will to kill is even stronger... so the tagline of the movie is 'the shark can do anything, when death is on the menu'. Jiggs:The Chain Saw Wielding Shark will hit theaters in december for the christmas crowd.
My idea is a shark evolves in the depths of the sea, to breathe blood cause it just kills that much, it's always in blood. So essentially he kills just about everything in the sea, so he needs to feed on a different meal. So with his innate ability to breathe in a pool of blood, he comes onto shore by killing a bunch of spring break coeds (probably the laguna beach cast). So he eats his way through the ppl waiting in traffic all the way to a stadium full of people listening to whatever band i can cast (probably MSG cause they're gonna blow up soon). The tagline for the movie is 'When blood is the air, ladies and gentlemen beware'. Shark Attack X: Eater quad-X the Blood Breather will be released straight to beta and laserdisk, in two weeks.
Well anyways which one is more ridiculous? comment now or ask questions...
-the matt
posted by aeternus @ 10/19/2005 01:14:00 AM
2 Comments:
At 10/19/2005 08:14:00 AM,
Folk Master Flex said…
Matt your idea is more ridiculous because its more off the wall. What is the blood getting into his gills or something. And when he is on land is he thrashing his prey about so the blood from the divided torsoes flies into his gills.
At least Jon's idea somewhat makes sense because the shark needs a chainsaw to chop his victims up into bite size pieces. Unless he's a megalodon where he can swallow whole an entire life raft full of people.
At 10/20/2005 01:11:00 AM,
aeternus said…
I got it! We combine the two movies into the most awesomely ridiculous film ever. We'd be so drunk by the first 30 minutes, oh man it'd be great....
Post a Comment
<< Home